Free Tools

MELD-Na & MELD 3.0 Calculator

Model for End-Stage Liver Disease — sodium-adjusted (UNOS 2016) and MELD 3.0 (UNOS 2023) for cirrhosis severity, 3-month mortality and transplant listing. Calculations run locally in your browser.

MELD 3.0 (Kim 2021) replaced MELD-Na for U.S. allocation in July 2023. It adds female sex and albumin and corrects historical under-prioritisation of women. India's NOTTO has not yet mandated MELD 3.0 — most Indian transplant programmes still allocate on MELD-Na, but MELD 3.0 is increasingly used for prognostication.

Laboratory values

Clinical context

MELD Score

Disclaimer: The MELD score estimates 3-month mortality from chronic liver disease and is an allocation tool — it does not replace clinical assessment. It is not validated in patients <12 years, in acute liver failure (use King's College Criteria), or in acute-on-chronic liver failure (use CLIF-C ACLF or AARC). Always confirm with your hepatology and transplant team before listing decisions.

Frequently asked questions

Why is MELD-Na better than the original MELD?

Hyponatraemia in cirrhosis reflects circulatory dysfunction and predicts mortality independently of MELD. Adding sodium (Kim 2008) reclassified ~27% of waitlist deaths and reduced mortality on the U.S. waitlist by ~3–7%. UNOS adopted MELD-Na in January 2016. The Na correction is applied only when MELD > 11, and sodium is bounded between 125 and 137 mEq/L.

What changed in MELD 3.0?

Kim et al. (2021) showed MELD-Na under-prioritised women (lower creatinine for the same true GFR) and patients with low albumin. MELD 3.0 adds female sex (+1.33), albumin and interaction terms; caps creatinine at 3.0 mg/dL instead of 4.0; and applies a continuous sodium correction. UNOS switched to MELD 3.0 in July 2023. Listing threshold is unchanged at ≥15; exception points (HCC, hepatopulmonary syndrome, etc.) are added on top.

When should I list a patient for transplant?

Transplant survival benefit over remaining on the waitlist crosses zero at MELD ~15 (Merion 2005). Most centres begin formal transplant work-up at MELD ≥15, or earlier for HCC within Milan criteria, refractory ascites, recurrent variceal bleed, hepatopulmonary syndrome or porto-pulmonary hypertension. In India, NOTTO allocation prioritises by MELD-Na with standardised exception points. Living-donor transplant in India is not strictly MELD-driven but most programmes activate evaluation at MELD ≥15 or with significant decompensation.

What if the patient is on dialysis?

If the patient received ≥2 sessions of haemodialysis OR ≥24 hours of continuous renal replacement therapy in the prior 7 days, set creatinine to the cap (4.0 for MELD-Na, 3.0 for MELD 3.0). This prevents "gaming" the score by improving creatinine through dialysis.

What is the lowest possible MELD-Na?

Six. All three lab values are floored at 1.0 inside the natural logarithm (ln 1 = 0), so the minimum is 0.643 × 10 ≈ 6. The maximum allocation MELD in UNOS is 40 — scores above 40 are capped for listing purposes although the raw value remains prognostic.

What about MELD in acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF)?

MELD/MELD-Na underestimates short-term mortality in ACLF because the prognosis is driven by extra-hepatic organ failures. Use the CLIF-C ACLF score (EASL-CLIF, Europe) or the AARC score (APASL, widely used in India). A CLIF-C ACLF >64 at day 3–7 predicts >90% 28-day mortality and informs futility decisions.

References

  1. Kamath PS, Wiesner RH, Malinchoc M, et al. A model to predict survival in patients with end-stage liver disease. Hepatology 2001;33(2):464–470.
  2. Kim WR, Biggins SW, Kremers WK, et al. Hyponatremia and mortality among patients on the liver-transplant waiting list. N Engl J Med 2008;359(10):1018–1026.
  3. Merion RM, Schaubel DE, Dykstra DM, et al. The survival benefit of liver transplantation. Am J Transplant 2005;5(2):307–313.
  4. Kim WR, Mannalithara A, Heimbach JK, et al. MELD 3.0: The Model for End-Stage Liver Disease Updated for the Modern Era. Gastroenterology 2021;161(6):1887–1895.
  5. OPTN/UNOS Policy 9: Allocation of Livers and Liver-Intestines. Effective July 2023.
  6. Sarin SK, Choudhury A, Sharma MK, et al. APASL ACLF Research Consortium (AARC) Score. Hepatol Int 2019;13:353–390.
  7. NOTTO Standard Operating Procedures for Deceased Donor Liver Allocation, 2022.

3-month mortality bands from Wiesner et al. (2003) and OPTN registry data. Always defer to your transplant centre's listing protocol.

Tracking cirrhosis patients across visits and labs?

Try Dr. Notes — works offline, keeps records secure

Get Dr. Notes on your phone

Dr. Notes is available on both App Store and Google Play. Works offline, keeps records on your device.

Product updates

Get free product updates

Join thousands of clinicians getting Dr. Notes feature releases, new free clinical tools, and time-saving templates—straight to your inbox. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.